L -> R
.32 S&W
.32 S&W Long
.32 H&R or .32 Merwin & Hulbert Long
.32 H&R Magnum
Digging up the dimensions for .32 H&R was a pain since the sites that used to give the dimensions are all dead. One did come up on The Wayback Machine.
09 December 2018
2 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I've often thought that the .32 S&W would be a good choice for the modern airweight J-Frame revolver, the one that even the most recoil-sensitive individual could shoot, and gun store salesmen would actually be justified in recommending it as a good choice for a novice woman shooter. The round could be updated with a better slug profile than the LRN, although it probably shouldn't be monkeyed with in the pressure department because of all the antique revolvers out there.
ReplyDeleteI think that this was the idea behind .32 H&R Magnum. Modernize the .32 S&W and .32 S&W Long and change the case so pressure won't be an issue in old guns because it won't fit.
Delete