The bump-stock ban outside Florida by executive action via regulation might just get tripped up by making up stuff not mentioned in the actual law.
The law states clearly what is and is not a machine gun.
Guess what!
A bump-stock isn't, by the letter of the law, a machine gun.
This is how to argue it when you file your lawsuit.
If the lawsuit wins and gets the bumpstock ban struck on "that's not what the law says" grounds that could even be a springboard to getting other regulations which add new law rather than being means to enforce existing law.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.