No, nothing Ukraine did was casus belli.
Russia is definitely the belligerent here.
Russia did not take their preferred leadership being deposed well.
They didn't care that the Ukrainian leadership was corrupt as long as it stayed in their pro-Russia lane.
The US stopped caring about that same corruption as soon as the new leadership was corrupt FOR a certain family from Delaware.
But still corrupt.
When Russia took the Crimea, it should have been job one of the Ukrainian government to make sure it couldn't happen again. I admit they adopted a more Western doctrine, but didn't spend near the money on defense as they should once they had a neighbor that had proven a willingness to take parts of their country by force.
The time to get ready for a war is before the war starts. Some Chinese bloke said that, that or the cook on Alice.
Russian separatists and Neo-Nazis don't make the situation any easier or better. Another sub-conflict there where I wish both sides could lose.
But there's some reality to accept on the part of the pro-Ukrainian side.
Without substantial outside help Ukraine cannot hope to keep Russia at the present front lines. Even with substantial outside help, they will not be able to reclaim any territory lost to Russia.
To get back what they lost requires a cooperative Russia or a bigger war from bigger nations. The bigger nation most capable of doing that isn't likely to do so because we don't want to get into a nuclear war.
In short, they be fucked.
The best they can expect is to get the war to stop at the present lines. Worst is losing the entire place.
Russia isn't looking too great here either. They've spent a lot more than they planned. Even complete victory will be Pyrrhic. Even with Europe continuing to buy their petroleum, it's going to be a long time before their economy recovers and most of the sanctions will likely remain in place as long as they squat on the eastern section of Ukraine.
Which brings us to why the fuck was the US involved in the first place?
Well, we don't like it when a bully kicks a little guy, so we were sympathetic to Ukraine and felt a little guilty about letting them get run over in 2014.
Plus the family from Delaware had a vested interest in Ukraine.
Selling them guns is a good choice.
Giving them weapons when they're never going to be able to pay us back because they're never going to win... Bad choice. Best to stay out of that.
But we did give them weapons and did so at a time when the coffers were pretty dry. We've our own financial house to get in order and spending money on a lost cause isn't good business.
How much more do we need to spend until Russia decides that it's not getting any more of the place and decides to quit in place? How long before Ukraine pays that back?
I'd love for them to be able to win, but what do we get from it? What's our interest in making and keeping Russia an enemy?
I'm not saying we should be friends, but why are we making them a foe?
For what?
To keep Europe from being invaded?
That, still, sounds a lot more like a Europe problem than a USA problem and they fucking hate us anyway so fuck them! I know, not all of them, but enough.
Besides, I'm sick of their lopsided tariffs and trade practices. I'm especially sick of their protectionist hypocrisy and trade practices.
You will note that I am not allowing comments on this rant.