02 January 2018

We're Still Debating This?

The fighting utility of the bayonet is right up there with the functionality of elan vs Maxims.

They just aren't useful combat weapons anymore.  Just like horses aren't good combat transportation anymore.

Yet... you will still find a circumstance where they can be applied today.

For horses, well there's a movie coming out soon.  21 Jump Street 12 Strong (transposed the number, oops)...

For bayonets, and my Gods memories are short, there's prisoner poking!

It's useful to have the capability to poke POW's because oft-times they out number the guards in a ratio that Crazy Horse would have loved to have had at Little Big Horn Greasy Grass (winners get to name the battle).  Poking a prisoner elicits a different response from shooting one.

Shooting a prisoner can cause the herd to stampede.  "They're shooting us all!" being the thought.

Stabbing an out of line prisoner is more local and more likely to elicit a, "Dave had it coming, Dave's like that," and even that response being more localized.

Plus, the prisoners nearly always feel that you WILL stab them with the slightest provocation, where you won't shoot them.  Even if the opposite is true.

1 comment:

  1. Two out of the three weapons found in a rifle squad these days don't even take bayonets. Prisoner control and persuading civilians to move along is about it.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.