That's neat. It's kind of a contraption with all the moving parts and rotating linkages everywhere, but honestly looks fairly effective. Wear and/or mud would be issues, but absent those it looks like a decent way to do things for the age.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Posts
That's neat. It's kind of a contraption with all the moving parts and rotating linkages everywhere, but honestly looks fairly effective. Wear and/or mud would be issues, but absent those it looks like a decent way to do things for the age.
ReplyDeleteFrom most accounts the things just worked and did well in the mud.
DeleteThey weren't more widely adopted because Denmark refused to export or license the design to maintain their neutrality.