13 March 2024

Clarity

I figured out how to say it!

It's not that Morgan and Morgan isn't spending money on advertising through clever accounting.

The costs to a multi-billion dollar law firm here don't matter and I shouldn't have side tracked into it.

The "we bought guns with that ad money" defense is the problem.

Morgan and Morgan was going to spend that money advertising, no matter who they hired.

So, yes, Admin and Donut are getting over, somewhat, in spending an anti-gunner's money on something their employer would be happy to see banned.

The problem is if their ad gets someone to hire Morgan and Morgan and the pittance spent at the guntubers results in a winning case for the law firm.

The law firm's cut of these judgements is significant.  Far more than they spent on ads.

If they then turn around and use that money to fund the election campaign of a district attorney who rapes gun owners every chance they get...

Sure are nice guns aren't they?  But, hey, you got yours, right?

I'm old enough to remember when we called out dancing monkeys for their hypocrisy when they owned guns and shilled for anti-gun politicians.

I can even remember people being critical of places like Taran Tactical for training dancing monkeys who shill for anti-gun politicians.

But ex-cops shilling for anti-gun lawyers?

Cool?

No comments:

Post a Comment

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.