Obama Observation And I Am Not Alone

Obama has claimed there are 57 states. He's referred to the December 7th, 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor as "the bomb that hit..." and numerous other silly little mistakes.

The scope of these errors is similar to spelling potato with an extra 'e'.

So, you hypocrites, is Dan Quayle now intelligent or is Barack Obama a "fucking moron"?

This is perhaps the most telling example of how the press has chosen a party in politics. Dan's little gaff was news for weeks! Barry's is not covered at all.

Please allow me to add, ignorant to the list of reasons I will not be voting Dem for President.

Copyright 2008 Chris Muir

Guinness In His New Home Enjoying The Ride

My protector has a seat-belt!

Marv did the sewing of the web belt. We cut slots into the clutter catcher behind the seat to attach the belt to the car.

It means a lot to me to have a bear from The Boy in both Hot Rods. The old bear is in the Biscayne SS.

This is CC, he's been riding security in the Biscayne for a while. He never seemed comfortable in the Vette.

Happy Early Birthday!

I got The Lovely Harvey an extravagant birthday gift. Her b-day is not today, but I suck at waiting.

The bottommost earring is the gift. 0.78 total carat weight, H clarity. Really spendy, but I love her.

The Boy got her this:

This is Patches. Patches comes from http://www.buildabear.com/

Build-A-Bear is a really fun experience. You first pick the skin you like. Then you go over to the stuffing station where an employee fills it to your desired level of fluff. Just before they close the seam in the back, you pick out a little satin heart. There's a cute little ceremony that goes with it. First you rub it between your hands to make it a warm heart. Then you touch it to your head so it has all your wisdom. Then you touch it to your back so it will always have your back. Then you touch it to your ear so it knows all your secrets. Then you kiss it so it has all your love. Awwwwwwww! After the heart is inserted the seam is sewn shut and you pick out an outfit. There are all kinds to choose from.

The Lovely Harvey and I got The Boy his own:

He's named The Boy Junior.

The Boy gave me one too!

This is Guinness, he rides in the Corvette and keeps me safe. He's taking over from the other Army bear that The Boy gave me.

Build-A-Bear is a lot more fun and much cheaper than Vermont Teddy Bear.

The New Yorker Caricature

I do so love how several pundits are stating that, "this is how the right wing really sees Obama," or "This is exactly how Fox perceives [Obama]."

No. No we don't. About the only thing in that cartoon that I think equates to my view of him is the flag burning in the fireplace. But that's just because I think communism and socialism are un-American.

I'm against him because he's voted anti-freedom and pro-socialism when ever he's bothered to show up to actually vote. That coupled with his massive lack of experience makes him a poor candidate to me. His wife bugs me because she acts like she's running as a co-candidate. This bothered me about Hillary too. Only one name on the ballot for the job, and it's not the spouse.

Those are all valid positions. They are not based on his race. If I was voting against him because of race, I would just say, "No [censored] in the WHITE House!" and be done with it. But I'm not a racist.

If he was a Moslem, I would be hesitant to vote for him even if I agreed with everything else. They have not, as a people, established a good track record of running nations yet and I don't like the idea of being the test case.

Please to not take my opposition to Obama as a shining endorsement of McCain.

His endless campaign to close the so-called gunshow loophole. His flagrant violation of the 1st amendment with the campaign finance reform. His very age and health concerns. All of those are strikes against him.

I'd mention his support of amnesty for illegal aliens, but I think both candidates have that in common.

Something I Can't Post In The Car Forums

GM just announced some major cuts. http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/15/news/companies/GM/index.htm?postversion=2008071512

The Corvette forum is awash in how GM is sticking it to the little guy when times get hard.

What I want to ask them, and I cannot ask them there for fear of being banned, is; "Do you own a car that isn't a GM? Isn't from an American brand?" Because if the answer to either question is yes, they are part of the problem that GM has. GM didn't fuck the little guy, YOU DID!

And in point of fact, GM cannot take care of their largest problem, the unions. What this round of lay-offs will do is flood the engineering job market. They are taking this out on white collar only, in jobs and pensions.

What GM should do is file bankruptcy. That would allow them to address all of their problems, not just the white collar ones (which prolly wouldn't be a problem without the UAW albatross around its neck).

I think the idea of a union is a fine thing. The reality of unions is they ask for too much. Did I say ask? Extortion is the term for the way they do business in any other situation.

Just Couldn't Say No To The Price

An acquaintance of mine runs a stereo installation shop.

Last Wednesday he asked me to verify that the rifle he was buying was worth the asking price, it was. While I was waiting around I asked him about the empty hole in his display. He said that he was going to throw that damn thing away, nobody wants to buy them. Mike's business centers around people who are currently being swept on the Alpine winds of fashion.

"That damn thing," turns out to be a Kenwood Excelon DNX-8120 head unit. I joke that if he's just going to throw it away, I'll take it! "Take it!" he says. I had to buy the parts to install it, but it was nothing compared to the price of the unit, MSRP is like $1,900.

All advertised features are working, and I would recommend this head unit to anyone who asks. Even the hands-free Bluetooth part works! That's better than the TomTom, which had massive buzzing.

Some pics of the various modes.

Garmin navigation:

FM Tuner:

XM Tuner:

iPod playing music:

iPod playing video (do you recognize it?):

Getting ready to insert a DVD:

Opening flash showing the on screen controls for a DVD:

DVD in play (Scene from Layer Cake):

XM Weather showing current conditions:

XM Weather showing current clouds and rain:

XM Traffic Map:

XM Traffic Summary:

Garmin Stocks (useless, but entertaining):

A pic during the install. Being a DIY hot-rodder means that I did the install.

Location of the Garmin/Kenwood GXM30 tuner/antenna. I removed the center speaker. You can see my helper, Brett, reflected in the windsheild:

The XM reception was cutting in and out a lot more than the OEM antenna. So I changed my mounting a bit to raise it a little higher.

Just Click On The Link

http://www.electricoyster.com/electric3d/index.html

It's really that cool!

Do As I Say Not As I Do

Politicians; when you admonish me for something I have not done, be sure you have done it yourself; when you admonish me for something I am doing, be certain that you are not doing it.

Obama, don't demand I learn to speak Spanish when you don't.

Gore, don't demand I give up my car when you fly in a private jet.

More Heller

The mayor of DC doesn't seem to have registered that the Supreme Court said handguns without qualification when stripping the ban. That really does mean that he can't stop banning revolvers while continuing to ban semi-automatics.

The common use language of the ruling supports my position as well.

A side note to every one of my friends that called me paranoid, irrational or delusional about what kind of "people" are out to ban guns; I told you so. Mayor Fenty's behavior is exactly what I expected.

What I want to know, since this is justice delayed, is what recourse a gun owner has against the politicians that have been denying our civil rights, and continue to violate them now that it is established that it is, indeed, the civil right I have been claiming it was all along?

If we were talking about speech and racism, we'd call it a hate crime and I would be able to sue his balls off. I think it's time that we used this ruling not just to repeal unconstitutional law, but to sue the politicians who have been actively denying us our unalienable rights! Mayors Fenty, Daley, Bloomburg; Senators Schumer, Harkin, Boxer, Feinstein... Everyone who voted for the AWB and the President who signed it. There's no statute of limitations on rights violations. Do not attempt to say that since the AWB expired I don't have a claim. "I only kidnapped him for a little while." is not a defense. "I only raped her once, and I stopped," is not a defense.

Who Killed The Electric Car

This not a rant about that movie at all.

The reason the EV-1 wasn't going to sell in the quantities required to make it viable has a lot to do with its 75 mile range. For everyday commuting, 75 miles isn't too bad. Plugging it in at night works just fine if you live within 37.5 miles of work. If work has a place for you plug in, then you can live 75 miles from work!

The problem, of course, surfaces when you want to go farther than 75 miles.

Just giving some local examples from where I live. If I want to spend a fun filled day at Disney World, it's 109 miles one way. EV-1 can't do that in one hop. So I'd have to find a hotel or someplace to sit for 8 hours while the car charges. Think about that for a sec. Drive for an hour, sit for eight, drive another half hour to get there.

Most gas powered cars have a safe 400 mile range. It takes only a few minutes to replenish that range.

I am sure the hotel industry would love everyone driving an EV-1.

Batteries are better than they used to be. A modern EV-1 would get about 225 miles to a charge. Enough to get from here to Disney and back! But a charge is still a one day deal realistically. The 1500 mile trip to Iowa would take a week (6 2/3 charges). My gas guzzling Vette does that same trip in two days at the speed limit (and uses 4 tanks of gas).

Now, all of the above does not kill the gas-electric or diesel-electric car at all. A Prius can do the trip to Iowa at the speed limit just as fast as I can in the Corvette. Even considering they don't get their full rated economy with continuous highway use, they get great mileage.

My principle objection to hybrids (and electrics) are the pollution to make the batteries is never mentioned; the materials to make the advanced batteries require petroleum; no hybrid advocate has a plan for what to do about those batteries when they finally do wear out.

A Thought On The Heller Decision

Several of the mainstream press have been griping about the Supreme Court not considering the effect their ruling was going to have on society.

After my initial reaction of, "tough shit!" I mellowed my response a bit.

If the damn court had not waited seventy years to make a ruling, society would not have committed itself to so much unconstitutional behavior, and the adjustments would be much smaller.

Evolution

A small point that gets missed about evolution is that all a mutation needs to continue to be passed on is that mutation doesn't prevent the mutant from breeding successfully.

This allows some intermediate mutations that allow future mutations to be advantageous.

There have been a few creationists who have claimed that for evolution to be true, all mutations must be advantageous. That's not true. They merely have to not be disadvantageous.

The mutation must allow the mutant to live long enough to breed, and that is all.

I Think I've Been Promoted

The Dante's Inferno Test has banished you to the Third Level of Hell!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:

Level	Score
Purgatory (Repenting Believers)	Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers)	Very Low
Level 2 (Lustful)	Very High
Level 3 (Gluttonous)	Extreme
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious)	High
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy)	Very High
Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics)	Extreme
Level 7 (Violent)	Extreme
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers)	Very High
Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous)	High

Take the Dante Inferno Hell Test

Science And Faith

With all the BS here about religion I think there is a religious topic that definitely needs to be taught in schools.

The difference between science you don't understand and faith that cannot be understood.
I grabbed a lot of sympathy for Christians with a thought, "Faith is the big, huge, thing in their religion. To maintain that faith in the face of all the contradictory science must really hard." Then one day a follow-up thought hit me. What if God set it all up to contradict His book as a test of that faith?
That thought wasn't enough to make a believer out of me. It has made me a lot more tolerant about them.
It's also made me a bit less tolerant of the people who say things like, "Stupid Christians, don't they know the science clearly shows..." Yeah, I think they do. I think the smartest Christians are the ones living in a sort of dual universe where God made the place in seven days, but made it to appear and behave as if it were more like 15 billion years old.
If they can reconcile it, let them.
The Intelligent Design debate has me twisted up. I don't buy their ideas, but the debate has raised some issues for me.
While I agree that teaching religion in state funded schools is a violation of the 1st Amendment, I am beginning to believe that the way we are not teaching religion is in fact teaching Atheism. Atheism is a position about religion, therefore teaching it in the schools is also a violation of the 1st Amendment.
I believe that it's is impossible to have a position and not pass it along in your teaching. I think that logically leads to the State being unable to have schools because teaching anything can have religion in it.
I am fine with science at school, religion at home. I think that science can be taught in a manner that doesn't advocate atheism. For the government to continue to fund schools it has to. Otherwise the State Religion IS Atheism. "There is no God" is as much a religious position as, "I am Catholic."
The moment it stops being science is when we ask "Why?" Science is "How?"

Quote Of The Random Interval

"Torture is any experience so horrible that no-one would consider trying it out simply for the purpose of writing a Vanity Fair article about what it’s like."

From: http://sweasel.com/archives/1269

Much Unfocused Disjointed Rambling Here

Once again, the media has missed why getting this 2nd amendment thing in line with the standard model is so damned important.

I don't think they realize just how close the US is to a second revolution, or should that be third?

The people who believe in the 2nd amendment are folks who believe in changing things with soap boxes, ballot boxes and cartridge boxes. In that order.

I think the soap box has been dead for quite some time. It might be coming back since control of publishing on the internet is controlled by so very many voices. The soap box was controlled by an amazingly small group of people running television, radio and the printed press. The internet publishes how many different points of view?

The ballot box is teetering on the edge. A gigantic segment of the population is not being given a candidate that represents how they feel in any meaningful way. For example, McCain is very much a Democrat, if he ran in 1980. But since it's 2008, he passes as a republican? I don't think so. By the same light, Obama is not a Democrat by 1980 standards either. In 1980 we'd have called him a commie. If you are conservative, libertarian or Kennedy style Democrat; who do you vote for? FDR and LBJ Democrats can vote McCain and the Socialist Liberals can vote Obama.

I weep because I stood post in WEST Germany in 1988. I was there to prevent the Communists from invading Western Europe. Turns out we should have been paying less attention to the "enemies foreign" and more attention to the "or domestic" portion of our service oaths. Socialism and it's cousin, Communism, killed on the order of 350 million people in the 20th century. And they are actually worried about the 30k per year that are killed by a firearm in the USA? That's 3,000,000 per century (about 55% are suicides). Hitler got five times that in six years, not counting combat deaths from WW2. Stalin got 51 million in just 12 years, again not counting combat deaths from WW2. Mau snuffed out between 40 and 75 million between 1949 and 1975, and an additional 9.5 mil were killed in the revolution that brought him to power. Pol Pot got half of a century's worth of the US gun death rate in JUST THREE YEARS! Just counting the big guys gives a rate of 2.9 million a year for the 46 years these SOCIALISTS were in charge.

How many of his own people did the hated Reagan murder? Eisenhower? Nixon? Ford? Either Bush? For that matter, FDR, JFK, LBJ, Carter, or Clinton? I posit that it were the guns that saved us.

I don't want a choice between a quick or a slow death. I want to live!

There are too many people who've noticed that nobody represents their point of view and who have stopped voting. Talk about a self fulfilling prophecy! If you don't vote, you definitely won't get a voice.

There's a bit of a problem though. To get the damn Republicans to try something that will represent me, I have to vote for a Democrat. (Or vice versa, but the Republicans are closer to where I am.)

The parties seem to have figured out that if one side runs one that the other considers a disaster the other side will come out in droves. Terry Branstad didn't win all those elections because he was popular, or even a great governor, he won because no matter how bad he was, the Democratic Party of Iowa would find someone who appeared far worse. I feel the same way in the upcoming presidential election. No matter how bad I think McCain is (In 1999 I liked him better, but I knew him less) Obama will be far worse.

He's just about everything I don't like about The Democratic Party in one giant ball. He's got the Carter economic smarts. He's got the Clinton turn on a dime to follow the poll. He's got the racist entitlement thing down pat.

Health care is not going to be fixed by handing out coverage paid by taxation. Try to remember that many of the costs in medicine are caused by the ever increasing amount of do-gooder laws.

Gas is not going to be cheaper by taxing the oil companies more. When has increasing expenses ever caused a product to get cheaper?

And full circle, banning guns will not make crime go away. Crime predates the invention of guns! People were murdered with knives for millennia before the invention of gun powder.

Banning guns, increasing taxes to pay for health care for people who aren't working themselves or paying taxes, and making it too expensive for us to get to work will cause a change. Atlas might just shrug.

The conservative position is over represented in the military; should a real revolution come it might just start with a Colonel. The people who think that the Mexicans should all go home, that you should work for a living, that we should stop exporting all our tech jobs to India and all our manufacturing jobs to China also tend to own all the guns.

This could be a very short revolution.

Or there could be no revolution at all. But a particular political party has got to stop pushing us against the wall. What's going to happen when we discover we have nothing to lose by attempting to shoot the bastards?

Iraqi People Say For US Troops To Get Out From Underfoot

It Seems That People Overlook This A Lot

For some reason I am coming across a lot of articles about how having a gun on the plane on 9/11 would have either made no difference, or would have saved the day.

When it's suggested to allow conceal carry on an aircraft, often it's mentioned that the permit holder would have an extensive background check and training.

What nobody on either side of this debate seems to have noticed; the terrorists used box cutters because you could just walk onto a plane with them.

Why does everyone seem to assume that the terrorists would not have taken the course to get the airplane CCW?

If there had been citizen conceal carry on airplanes on 9/11, there probably would have been at least one terrorist per plane with a gun. I am not certain that an armed passenger would have made much difference on that day anyway. The thing that even my Dad noticed; hijackers never killed the entire plane! He related that he would probably have sat in his seat and waited for the plane to land and the negotiations to begin. If he'd had a gun, he would have waited until the plane was on the ground before starting anything because you might be able to use one of the emergency exits.

I'm Gonna Git Medieval On Your Ass

The YHM Phantom 5C2 that came with my 6.8 upper was intended for a 7.62 NATO rifle, thus it was too damn big for a 6.8 rifle.

This is the Troy 5.56 Medieval Flash Hider on The Lovely Harvey's carbine. I liked it a lot when she got it, but I didn't know there was a 6.8 version...

This is the Troy 6.8 Medieval Muzzle Brake on Dottie. I would have preferred a flash hider instead of a brake, but they don't make one.

There, that looks a lot better than before!

The M9 bayonet is returned to regular service too!

How it looked before...

Some modeling by The Lovely Harvey!

We need brutal muzzle attachements because the damn jackals surround us in a threatening manner quite regularly! This is her carbine, by the way.

Biscayne SS Status Report

In case I didn't mention it, we've had the Biscayne SS running for a while.

Today Marv and I got the air conditioning running.

Had two minor irritations with it. First we got a whiz-bang variable oriface valve. This should let the AC work better at idle. There was no obvious front or back, so we put it in backwards. Of course, once in wrong, it wouldn't come back out. We had to pick it out a little bit at a time with needle-nose pliers.

Second irritation was once the system was all sealed up and charged that the compressor wouldn't engage. Marv discovered that if he jumpered the relay, the compressor would come on. Pressure was correct, so there was no reason for the system to not be running. For some reason the computer was not sending the signal to trip the relay. We took a break to eat (DAMN GOOD PORK CHOPS HONEY!) and I mulled it over in my mind.

The wiring for the engine swap is something of a Frankenstein disaster under the hood. I suggested to Marv that perhaps one of the wires no longer made it all the way from under the hood to the computer. So we took the dash apart and checked resistance to all the wires. The 5v signal from the PCM to the high pressure transducer had a 4k ohm reading! Marv respliced it into the wire I had originally selected and suddenly we had AC!

Stuff that is left to do:
Put the new carpet in.
Install the powder coated calipers and drums.
Fix the rear window on the driver's side, it's off track.
Switch the instrument cluster from the Olds to a 9C1 (The Lovely Harvey prefers the digital speedo).
Get the Biscayne emblems on.
Install a hidden antenna.

I Am McThag Harbinger Of Wet

I leave the floods in Iowa and look what happens up the road when I get back!

Iowa Floods

I took a metric buttload of pictures of the flooding. Tim took a buttload more.

Go here for the album: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8553502@N05/sets/72157649744887021/

This is a whirlpool near S 16th in Ames.

Trip Photos

White Castle in Bowling Green, KY across the street from the hotel.

The original Starbuck's! A Nevada, IA tradition since my parents were dating in 1959! No fruffie coffee drinks and oddly titled counter help here. Just good, hearty, Iowa food.

Tenderloin and cheddar cheese balls!

Some of the flooding near Oskaloosa, IA along Route 163.

It's hard to see, but this is in Ottumwa, IA from the S. Wappello St Bridge over the Des Moines River.

The Boy and the puppy at first rest stop in Florida.

Shi Shu is not a real happy passenger, but he coped pretty well.

He even helps drive if you let him crawl up there...

Still More On Rights

I'm a believer in the distinction between positive and negative rights. Put simply, whether a right is positive or negative depends on what an outside party must do.

For example: A negative right to own a firearm means that you may not prevent me from buying one. A positive right to own a firearm means you have to buy me one. I say buy because I believe in property rights as well. A negative right to own a gun does not create a right to steal one.

I believe that almost all rights are negative. I have a right to property, but you don't have to buy me any. I have a right to life, but you don't have to save me or provide for me. I have a right to own a gun, but you don't have to issue one to me. I have a right to get an education, but you don't have to pay for it.

Rights only exist as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others.

You cannot deprive me of my rights until you show that I am violating the rights of others. I have a right to own property. This does not grant me a right to steal. Theft is a violation of another's right to property. So I can deprive a thief of his rights when he steals from me.

I believe that once you violate one of a person's rights, you have forfeited all of yours; including right to live. Violate my property rights and I am now empowered to kill you. If through the kindness of my heart I do anything less, like restrain you until the police can collect you, I am within my rights as well. Remember, it is charity not duty that would keep a thief alive in my house.

This is an aspect of rights that the law fairly routinely gets wrong. Duties to retreat, prohibitions on using lethal force to protect property, etc...

The State is not given special immunity from retribution. There may be special forms of retribution that are used on The State, but they are accountable to the same rules as the rest of us, and should be held to a much higher standard.

Back to the police example. This guy wanted to go home to see if there was anything to salvage. The police stopped him. When he attempted to bypass the police, they jumped in front of his truck. That led to his arrest.

Lots of people are defending the police. I cannot. The State, through the police, were violating this citizen's right to his property. This is primarily because of bad law; however, I will not accept the "following orders" defense.

Now, in our example, let's change the actors around a bit.

I have decided that your house is a death trap. I wait on your lawn for you to return home and physically prevent you from entering your house when my arguments fail to convince you of the danger. Now who has committed assault?

Why is The State doing the same thing as above BETTER than an individual? Think hard before answering. It's not better. It's EXACTLY THE SAME THING!! The police do not have the power to violate my rights, look it up, any more than a common citizen. This is the fine line between subject and citizen. Subjects must do what The State tells them. Subjects only have what "rights" The State decides they have.

It has long been my position that The State should operate under stronger restrictions than individuals because, if for no other reason, The State can bring so many more resources to bear on a given event. When an individual citizen is killed, that person is all gone. When an individual agent of The State is killed, The State remains, and is not greatly diminished. To choose the noble decision to serve the community as an agent of The State means surrendering a certain amount of individuality and some of the attendant rights. Read that again, becoming a cop means you have fewer rights on the job, not more. This applies to soldiers as well. I noticed in my service contract I was surrendering many of my rights while I was enlisted in the Army. Again, I am not asking the police for anything I was not willing to give.

There is still more, but it's only slowly congealing.

It Occurs To Me

that I have repeated myself several times on several issues here.

I am not changing people's minds.

Perhaps I am not all that good at expressing myself.

I will probably keep trying.

Sometimes things seem so clear, but I cannot articulate my sight into words.

Rights

From reading the background materials that the authors of our fine constitution recommended, I have come to the conclusion that rights are...

Rights are something that The State cannot pass ANY laws to stop me from doing. If I have a right to free speech, they are forbidden to pass a law telling me what I am allowed to say and where I am allowed to say it.

Rights do come with consequences. The classic example is yelling, "fire!" in a crowded theatre. I have a right to yell, "fire!" whenever I want. I do not have a right to be immune to the effects of my yelling. If someone dies in the stampede to get out, I have committed manslaughter. This is a subtle distinction about the right.

Recently I mentioned that a homeowner has a right to access his property. That means the state cannot, ever, bar my way. There are consequences to entering one's property in a disaster area. If a responsible adult is willing to accept those risks, then so be it. For disaster roadblocks, the cops should be filtering for people who don't have a right to be there. If I leave my property and start looting the neighbors, I am no longer within my rights and the police can now do something against me.

Remember, we are talking about rights, not law. Laws say lots of unconstitutional things. We are not talking about powers. Powers are something that "we the people" grant to government to execute our will, these powers are clearly delineated in the constitution in plain English. This is an important distinction, The State has powers, The People have rights. Laws are how The State is supposed to exercise its powers to protect The People's rights. The supporting reading pretty clearly indicates that we people are supposed to handle most disputes among ourselves. This is where the line between civil and criminal comes in.

Now, lets look at The US Constitution. No mention of a power that can prevent me from entering my property in a time of emergency. Amendments 9 and 10 specifically say that unless mentioned above, the government is not allowed. Amendment 14 applies the restrictions on the Federal government to the States (and lower jurisdictions). This means a state law that is unconstitutional under the federal constitution is unconstitutional even if it would have been legal under the state's constitution. So, since the government has no power to bar me from my rightful property, then it cannot. Seems simple doesn't it? It was supposed to be simple.

This is not a block of understanding that I am capable of delivering in a short essay. To fully grok, you'll have to pursue books by Locke, Machiavelli, Plato and Hobbes. You will need to read The Federalist Papers. Reading this stuff is painful, it's not written in modern English (or are translated). Understanding this stuff is not really difficult, but it's also not easy.

The modern police in the US is very much the standing army the anti-federalist faction were warning us about in the Federalist debate. The founders literally could not imagine our nation allowing the police such a monopoly. Citizens were expected to do most of the duties that today's police do. Not professionally, but when asked by the community. Normal citizens used to routinely be deputized to augment the very much smaller professional law enforcement personnel.

There is more, but it has not gelled.

Power Tour Follow-Up

I brought some souvenirs of my trip!

Clarification

I am sometimes caught trying to explain WHY I am so opposed to some of the "reasonable restrictions" on firearms ownership.

It all comes down to, "It must be impossible for the Government to confiscate all of the guns, and to know with any certainty that they have done so."

A registration list of guns can be used to confiscate them. Such lists have, in fact, been used for just such purposes in New Jersey and California. Without such lists the government does not KNOWthat I have a particular firearm. They may suspect, but they will not know. Nor will I have to explain where said gun has gone if they cannot find it during a search to confiscate it.

There are several back-doors into defacto registration.

There's an LBJ quote that sums up gun laws nicely: "You do not examine legislation in the light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, but in the light of the wrongs it would do and the harms it would cause if improperly administered." I would add, let the opposition define "improperly administered" because their imagination will be bigger than yours about what can go wrong. LBJ didn't, and he signed GCA68.

Freedom Of Movement

There's been some news about the Iowa State Patrol arresting a guy who attempted to bypass a police road-block to return to his home to see how much damage there was from the flooding and to salvage what he could.

The police are barring residents from returning home "for their own safety".

I have some mixed feelings about this. The core of my misgivings is from, "If there is one place where I definitely have a right to be, it's my own home or property." If I have a right to be there, you have no power to bar me from getting there. This is how rights are supposed to work folks.

Some objections I am hearing:

"But it's dangerous!" OK, so it's dangerous. Warn me that it is. Warn me that emergency services are not available. Warn me that looters are being shot, so don't be outside of where you have a right to be. Once that's taken care of, I am on my own and nobody else can be held liable for me being crushed by my roof if it collapses on me while I am attempting salvage.

"The police have a duty to protect you!" They do? Then why all the court cases where they fight tooth and nail to avoid being held accountable for the death of a given person?

I have more, it just hasn't jelled into a coherent post yet.

Jews In The Attic

Quoted in its entirety, with the author's permission. http://www.joehuffman.org/Freedom/JewsInTheAttic.htm

To the best of my knowledge I am the originator of this test and the name I use to describe it. It first came about in 1999 while I was working with Cease Fear (Cease Fear predates The Pink Pistolsby about a year although the Pink Pistols is far more successful). We were putting hand-outs in the shops in the Capital Hill area of Seattle for NRA Refuse to Be A Victim and Home Firearm Safety classes. The Capital Hill area is well known LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi, and Trans-sexual) community in the Seattle area. Our goal was to teach people of the LGBT community how to defend themselves against people who would attack them (gay-bashings). Several of the others and I in Cease Fear were certified NRA firearms instructors and were willing to donate our time to help make their lives safer. One of the discussions we had amongst ourselves as we walked from shop to shop was how to explain to others how important our right to keep and bear arms was to our freedom. People tend to understand the importance of freedom of speech and the freedom of the press pretty well and some of the other rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. But the Second Amendment was and is viewed as unimportant and perhaps even counterproductive by many in today's society. I explained to the others in my little band of activists that I looked at all laws that restricted freedom with a view to the impact it would have in a worst case scenario of our government run amok. Will this law make it difficult or impossible to protect innocent life from a government intent on their imprisonment or death? Although I pretty much made everything up on the spot I told them I called this test my "Jews In The Attic Test". Furthermore I told them that if it fails this test no further discussion is really needed, the law must be opposed in the most vigorous manner possible.

Some laws that fail the test and why:

Government mandated ID cards and the authority to demand them at any time. The oppressed class will be unable to masquerade as a member of the neutral or oppressor classes.

Searches without probable cause. Imagine you are attempting to smuggle your "Jews in the attic" to a safer hiding place. If the police at the roadblock can search all vehicles then you and your precious cargo are headed to the "work camps".

Government monopoly on medical care. This is a bit surprising -- isn't it? If it is illegal for you to pay someone for anonymous health care then how can your "Jews in the attic" receive health care?

Firearm or firearm owner registration. The registration information can be used to confiscate the firearms used to protect innocent life -- as it was under the 1938 Weapons Control Act in Nazi Germany.

Elimination or severe restriction of anonymous financial transactions. The purchase of food and other supplies for your "Jews in the attic" would show up in the records as being excessive compared to what your needs were. Just as power consumption records are used today to catch home marijuana growers.

I continue to use this test to this day and advocate it's widespread use by others.

What Be Yer Pirate Name Lubber?

My pirate name is:



Bloody Harry Kidd

Every pirate lives for something different. For some, it's the open sea. For others (the masochists), it's the food. For you, it's definitely the fighting. Even though you're not always the traditional swaggering gallant, your steadiness and planning make you a fine, reliable pirate. Arr!

Get your own pirate name from piratequiz.com.
part of the fidius.org network