Posts
Comments
OK, Ruger, Magpul, you have my attention with the RXM.
 |
| Picture from: https://grabagun.com/media/catalog/product/R/u/Ruger-RXM-19401-736676194018.jpg |
Kinda want.
This also marks the moment that I've forgiven Ruger the company for the sins for Bill Ruger and his son.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
It bears a strong resemblance to Polymer 80, who was sadly run out of business by Biden, BATFE and Cal DOJ. It does show one typical Ruger in, the unecessary warning on the side of the frame about the lack of magazine safety.
ReplyDeleteIt's definitely ineresting though. Putting all the FCG into that module is interesting. I wonder according to BATFE what the serialized part is. The advertising copy makes it sound like the frame or "grip module" may not be, if it is exchangable as they say.
I'm not sure how that FCG module affects things as far as cloning by 80% makers. I wonder if BATFE will consider any pre-bent or pre-drilled metal to be too close to be "able to accept parts" and whether bending and like for AK receivers will have to be done. Unfortunately with this whole UHC CEO killing putting "ghost guns" in a negative light again, I have little faith that the incoming Trump administration will do anything to undo the fuckery of Biden on the 80% market. I have a feeling BATFE is going to make it very difficult to get approval letters for anything anymore.
-swj