Tam posts on Canon rumors.
I hope that she's reading the tea leaves wrong about entry level ILC cameras going away.
I fear she's not wrong.
The problem with them disappearing is there's no place for someone who's not sure about getting a more capable camera to get one without jumping in with both feet.
The market is rapidly resembling a car market where you can buy pedal cars, crossover SUV's and Supercars. With nothing between.
If my first mirrorless ILC camera had to be a full frame one, I'd still be saving for it, and I would have watched my savings go to other things twice since.
The EOS R is substantially more expensive than the EOS M50 I bought.
$600 with a kit lens vs $2,700 with lens.
Uh... That's a lot of money to spend to see if you like taking pictures and swapping lenses.
Now that I've played with the M50 and am learning how to work a more fully featured camera, I can see a full frame mirrorless in my future. Maybe an R or R5 because I like how Canon does things.
I worry that without a market that bridges the point and shoot and full-frame cameras, the market for those will disappear too. It's already been contracting pretty darn hard as most everyone just uses their phones for all their photography needs.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.