In this post I called the M1913 "Patton" Saber an estoc.
There's just one teensy, wittle, problem.
The M1913 has a double edge.
It's length, weight, balance and such also more closely match a fencing saber.
It's not a chopper. It's a stabber.
But, unlike the pattern 1908, it has a cutting edge.
GURPS would treat it as a Fencing Saber.
When you look up what George was up to in 1912, it makes sense that a sword he designed would favor fencing rather than broadsword.
Never you mind that ANY play with a sword is fencing... That's the real world not GURPS.
23 May 2020
2 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is the Patton designed for point work and slashing and not hacking?
ReplyDeleteInteresting.
How does it compare to all your other sabers like the CivWar and IndianWar and SpanishAmericanWar ones?
It's a stabber that can cut. Like a live version of an Olympic saber.
DeleteThe manual is essentially Olympic fencing while dismounted and the P1908 methods while mounted.