29 July 2016

Show Us The Data

It's not science unless you can replicate the experiment!

Refusing to let others see the data nullifies your conclusions!
Posted by Angus McThag at 00:46
Labels: , ,

2 comments:

  1. Weer'd Beard29 July, 2016 09:00

    Note that Peer Review is not a sure-fire way to determine if a study is valid, because there are lots of junk studies that have passed peer review just because of oversight and sensationalism, not to mention the payola schemes uncovered in the East Anglia emails to intentionally put junk studies in peer-review articles.

    Still it takes hard work to skirt past the checks and balances of peer review, so if you're refusing to even submit your "Study" for peer review, I'd say the writing is on the wall.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Angus McThag29 July, 2016 10:55

      Releasing the data means that non-peers can also crunch on the conclusion. It's also the best way to show that you're not hiding anything.

      Delete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)