I have, on occasion, dismissed the M14 as just a Garand converted to take 7.62x51mm and a 20 round detachable magazine.
I should consider that an FAL is kind of an SAFN converted to take 7.62x51mm and a 20 round detachable magazine as well.
16 July 2016
2 comments:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think a FAL or a FAL owner would get very upset.
ReplyDeleteI'm an M1A owner, and I take no offense at considering an M14 as basically a Garand derivative. Especially since for all practical purposes the full auto capability of it was not used. Besides the caliber conversion and the detachable box mag which was a nice change compared to the enblock Garand clip, the only other real obvious upgrades were the more vented top cover to aid in barrel cooling and the flash suppressor/muzzle brake. That's fairly nice... I've shot my Garand at night a few times and the muzzle flash is to say the least, impressive. But really all the changes are more or less evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Perhaps owning and appreciating a Garand as well as the M1A makes me less likely to be offended also.
ReplyDelete