Posts
You didn't even have to pay much attention to what I've written to get the idea that I think the McMichael's and Bryan are culpable in the death of Mr Aubery.
But now there is a threat of violence if the "correct" verdict is not made.
Now I want them to be let off. Judge dismissing with prejudice and saying, "you threaten a riot over a verdict and the defendant is innocent."
The New Black Panther Party and BLM75 are no different in their behavior than a mob of KKK members outside a court building demanding that a black man accused of...
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THEY ARE ACCUSED OF!
It's mob justice. In the KKK example, a literal lynch mob.
The rule of law finds this sort of threat repugnant.
The proper response to these mobs, all of these mobs, is belt fed and water cooled.
I don't care what color the racists and bigots are.
Better yet, let them be found not guilty because Arbery was the attacker and the burglar and the one in the wrong.
ReplyDeleteThe two relatives were protecting their neighborhood because the police wouldn't.
The dumbass intellectually challenged bubba wasn't even near the incident.
Arbery is as much at fault to his own demise as George Floyd was.
But in the interest of 'social justice' and 'racial harmony' some jackwagon who was burglarizing and stealing and committing crimes will drag three people down because of him.
I agree that Abery was the provocation, when he rushed the individual holding the shotgun. If he had kept going or veered off into the woods, he would most likely have been safe. Once he "charged", it was a different game.
ReplyDeleteIf they had a responsive police force, the entire situation could have been avoided. If the police had responded, with lights, uniforms, etc, things might have gone differently. I would hope that the jury takes that into account. The taxpayers are not buying the pretty uniforms just so they can be soiled with powdered sugar at the donut factory.
The disconnect between moral and legal is tripping a lot of folks with this one.
ReplyDeleteMcMichaels was not morally wrong in following and attempting to detain someone who did not live in his neighborhood and whose presence was suspicious. The jogging story is thin. VERY thin.
The problem is the law is, presently, immoral. Thanks to the state shutting us out of our rightful role in enforcing the law as amateurs, it created a situation where McMichaels detaining Aubery isn't clearly legal and since its a situation he created by detaining Aubery, he doesn't have a self defense claim.
Enter the gray areas of the law at your own peril!
I want the law changed.
I disagree with the idea that property is not worth defending with lethal force. I disagree with the idea that a neighborhood has to suffer the free passage of people who do not live there and are clearly up to no good.
The law disagrees with me.
I am also of the opinion that deadly force should be allowed in defense of property.
ReplyDelete