05 December 2015

Surprising Comparison

An FAL is shorter than an M59/66A1.


Just by a bit, mind you, but it's real.

The weights are surprisingly close as well, although the FAL is lacking its bayonet.

Loaded PAP M59/66A1 is 9.8 lb.  Loaded FAL 50.00 is 10.4 lb. plus 0.5 lb. for the bayonet.

That extra pound and some gets you a detachable magazine, double the shots and 7d pi instead of 5d+1 pi.
Posted by Angus McThag at 22:51
Labels: , ,

2 comments:

  1. Weer'd Beard06 December, 2015 17:10

    Also they're distantly related, as I INC Saive heavily based the FAL design on the SVT-40, which is the SKS's Daddy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Angus McThag06 December, 2015 19:41

    Saive was developing what becomes the SAFN in the '30's at just about the same time that Simonov was working on the SVT-38. I don't think there was any cross-pollination between them at that time.

    The FAL is very much a modernized SAFN, some refinement might have leaked from the SVT, but it doesn't need to.

    I think it's a case of parallel design from engineers who saw machines the same way. A tilting bolt with a locking shoulder wasn't a new idea to either designer.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)