If you make seeking treatment for a psychological problem a disqualification for buying or owning a gun; people who own guns are going to avoid seeking treatment.
Which is worse? Someone who is perfectly safe while being treated or someone who isn't safe without treatment?
Many psych problems are transient and most are manageable. Few are actually dangerous.
This is why the cut off was supposed to be court ordered, which is what adjudicated means; a formal judgment. Due process.
Remember due process? There's a document that mentions that... The Bill of something something...
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.