Canon M50, EF-S 55-250; f/5.6, 1/1000", 250mm, ISO 640. Tripod, manual focus, cropped a lot. |
You can just barely make out banding on Jupiter.
I can't get better with the equipment I have thanks to my gigantic pixels compared to FuzzyGeff's or a full-frame camera.
All in all, I'm happy with this because I feel like I worked hard to get it.
About as good resolution as what Galileo had, so you're doing okay.
ReplyDeleteNow, use a telescope and mount the camera over the viewing lens (or use a binocular) and see what you get.
Cool Beans G.I.!!!,
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work!! Looking forward to more "Good Stuff!!!"
skybill
The single most important thing you could do to get an improvement is to use a mount that tracks the sky. After that, the most successful approach is to take a bunch of photographs and stack them.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.astronomie.be/registax/
This used to be the standard program everyone used but I haven't messed with it since the view from my backyard shrunk too much. Surprisingly, some of the best pictures came from using a webcam on the telescope and stacking a few minutes worth of exposures.
I am eyeing a couple of equatorial mounts and a better tripod.
DeleteBeing unable to get a true infinity focus with the EF and EF-S lenses through the EF-M adaptor is part of the frustration. Both my adapted lenses go past infinity when at full-stop.
The "zoom in" focus function doesn't zoom in enough to see if I'm getting what I want and the adjustments are a little coarse. It's easy to fat-finger out of focus.
Pixel size appears to be a factor here from what FuzzyGeff is saying.
There's supposed to be a 300mm EF-M lens coming soon, we'll see if it will auto-focus to infinity since it's not adapted.