The fact that a proponent of intelligent design predicted that so-called junk DNA actually has a functional purpose is not a proof that junk DNA having a functional purpose means intelligent design.
It just means we didn't understand DNA as well as we thought.
It also serves as a wonderful example that the science isn't ever settled.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.