Not that the IPCC was ever about science.
I've long said the important part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was Intergovernmental and not Climate Change.
Looks like there's some serious science against the IPCC recommendations.
I've long said that the solutions offered by the IPCC favored government, most especially more government control over everyone's daily life, and did nothing to change global warming.
It's long been obvious that the IPCC recommendations favored some nations at the expense of others. To the point that California could stop all carbon emissions and still see increasing amounts in their air because China is completely unaffected.
Taking this position has cost me a couple of friendships. I wonder if Anglave bothers to stop by any more. Probably not.
Considering that, over and over, we're seeing that climate is governed by orbital mechanics and solar activity than by anything man can do.
Watch that video carefully. How many times have you heard that the reason The Sahara was a desert was because people ruined it?
Maybe, just maybe, the worm is turning and people are waking up.
I sure hope so.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
The degreening of the Sahara, many have speculated and research has confirmed, is what (possibly, most likely) drove the pre-Egyptians into agricultural cities.
ReplyDeleteNot to hard to believe, as the same infrastructure that could support moving huge stone chunks around for art's sake was based on moving water for farming's sake.
Then there's the speculation (based on good research) that Western Europeans tended to thrive because their environment sucked and was trying to kill them. (Seriously, in comparison to central Africa or eastern Asia, the Western and Northwestern European climate has always been much harder, actually requiring people to work hard for food.