16 July 2015

Tomcat Tweaking

Strike Fighters 2: North Atlantic introduced the F-14A to the game.

Unfortunately, this expansion was kinda hurried.

There were some details that got missed.


The first thing that the fan base fixed was the anachronistic squadron markings.  VF-142 (Ghostriders) here didn't change to the Grim Reaper tail-art until late 1978; but not the AG code until they moved to USS Eisenhower in April 1982.  I don't have the AE code markings, sadly.  Because the game spans the early '50's until 1982 normally; you need the 1975-78 markings.



The next thing was the ejection seats, that was harder for me to fix.  If you look in the above picture you'll see a very plain-jane ACES II seat (borrowed from the long-released F-15A.

Thanks to the fine folks at The Mirage Factory, a proper GRU-7(A) ejection seat was made for their pre-North Atlantic release F-14 pack.  A seat that I had in my files from adding the A-6E to the game.


Yes, the difference is subtle, but it really affects the feel of the game for me.

There's some display modifications in the cockpit I'll be doing anon.

15 July 2015

Check With The Geeks First

Dear Hollywood,

Whenever you decide to make a comic movie, or a sequel to a beloved sci-fi movie, reboot a franchise etc...

Hire the most rabid of the fan base.

Actually, this can make you money:  Auction the jobs to the fan base at Comicon or something!

The fans will literally pay you to fix the movie.

It will keep you from stepping on your dicks again.

I bitched a little in May about it, but casting a black guy as the Human Torch and a blonde white woman as The Invisible Girl makes the geeks froth.

Susan Richards nee Storm is Johnny Storm's sister.

To cast one black and the other white just proclaims you're doing just to have a black character.

Why not cast a man to be Susan too?

That's different?  How so?

This is just a specific gripe about a much larger problem in Hollywood.

Films based on print properties where it's evident that the only thing the makers of the film read was the title.

Starship Troopers anyone?  The Hobbit for a recent example...

I had so hoped Hollywood was getting over it.

300 is frame for frame Frank Miller's comic.

The Harry Potter movies track well with the books.

The Lord of the Rings didn't do too bad either.

Then where was X-Men Last Stand...  For fucks sake, Singer set you up to segue into The Dark Phoenix Saga!  You could have made three movies to cover that arc and made what Marvel is doing with their "we couldn't sell these and they're all we have left" properties look unambitious and shallow.

If.  You.  Had.  Only.  Bothered.  To.  Read.  The.  Source.  Material.

With 300 lurking successfully in the background you should have realized that Frank Miller kind of knows his genre and you could have made The Wolverine run just like the 4-issue Wolverine comic and had something really epic...  Instead you made up your own sub-arc and plot that make the portions of Miller's work you did keep seem out of place and tacked on.

Both Last Stand and Wolverine suffer from an over emotional Logan pinin' for Jean Gray.  Again if they'd bothered reading Dark Phoenix, they'd have been handed his response on a plate and it'd been self consistent with the character.

Reading the source material and understanding it also lets you know when you can depart from the pages.  Days of Future Past is a very different comic from the movie, but it's OK because the changes mesh with the feel of the original.

It's why we love Heath Ledger's Joker when Cesar Romero's behaved far more like the character from the comics.

Reading the comics also is instructional in how to do a retcon properly and incorporate it into your story going forward.

Checking with the geeks also tells you if your changes are going to be met with disdain or acceptance.

Does Anything Normal Happen Here

Headline: "Cops Arrest Woman, 57, For Battering Female Domestic Partner With Dildo."

Pleasedon'tbeFlorida! Pleasedon'tbeFlorida! Pleasedon'tbeFlorida! Pleasedon'tbeFlorida! Pleasedon'tbeFlorida! Pleasedon'tbeFlorida!

"A Florida woman is facing a domestic battery charge..."

Pleasedon'tbenearhere! Pleasedon'tbenearhere! Pleasedon'tbenearhere! Pleasedon'tbenearhere! Pleasedon'tbenearhere! Pleasedon'tbenearhere!

"The confrontation Saturday evening occurred while a St. Petersburg Police Department officer was inside the home of..."

DAMMIT!DAMMIT!DAMMIT!DAMMIT!DAMMIT!DAMMIT!

We watch Cops! every once and a while and episodes in Florida have a certain... um... flavor. I dunno what's in the water, but I think it's excreted by manatees.

Sad h/t to WeaponsMan

14 July 2015

It's Barely Moved

In Traveller Imperial Year 1110 (5628 AD), as the Fifth Frontier War is wrapping up...

Voyager 1 will be 13,080 AU from Earth Terra.

That's 1,215,846,381,789.46 miles.  1,956,715,086,500 km.  75.54 light days.

0.20 light years.

0.063 parsecs.

After 3,651 years, it's still in the same hex with us.

Has anyone mentioned that space is big yet?

Even more fun...

If someone were to mount an expedition from Terra to Voyager 1 in a typical 30t Ship's Boat...

1.6g according to GURPS: Traveller.

It would take about 37 weeks to get there and match speeds.

It'd be a lot more comfortable in a 50t Modular Cutter and it's faster at 3.8g.  Just under 24 weeks.

Let's say we're in a hurry.

A 40t Pinnace pulls 5g.  Under 21 weeks.

A military ship pulling 6g will span it in about 19 weeks.

If we're really in a hurry we'll make a jump.  1 week.

So?

It's impugned that I own guns because I have a small dick.

This accusation is also slung at people who own Corvettes, which I do.

Tell you what, haters...

I do have a small dick.

It was small before I bought my first gun.  I was small before I bought the Corvette.  It remains small.

Even though it's small, I am not compensating for it with possessions.  Mostly because having a little dick has not bothered me since High School.

What compensation I do make has had more to do with tongue and fingers than buying shit.

If I was compensating there'd be a list of why I bought what I bought with lots of non-dick related justifications and no admission that I have a below-average size sex organ.  Compensation doesn't work the way they think it does.

The "force" of the impugnment is I should feel threatened by people with normal or large sized penises and that my purchases are a sort of display that proclaims to all that, "my cock is the same size as everyone elses!"  The corollary is I am correct in feeling bad that I don't have a normal sized prick, like they do, but I am merely choosing the wrong means of feeling better about it.

What they are doing with the comparison is cock-shaming me.  Once again, something that would be considered vile and off-limits in another context is allowed because of guns.

If I were to infer that a woman bought something expensive to compensate for her small breasts, how do you think they'd react?  But it's OK to shame me over both my small penis and my preferences in cars?

Bravo you inconsistent idiots.  Wait, that's not right.  You're consistently idiots, it's you inconsistently apply your "logic" because you're idiots.

PS:  A free bit of psychology:  The people who are most insecure about something are often the fastest and loudest about finding that insecurity in others, whether it exists or not.  Compensating for their (often perceived) inadequacies by ridiculing others in the hopes that nobody notices they are as inadequate as they claim the other they are making fun of is.

13 July 2015

What Happens

Read This

What happens when white people stop trying to prove the negative?

What happens when they say, "gonna be treated like a racist, might as well be a racist (you can also insert sexist, homophobe, islamaphobe, etc.)"?

What happens when they say fuck it and fuck you?

I really want to know.

I suspect that it won't be pretty.

Serbian Wonder Nine

Willard has scored a Zastava CZ999 Compact.  With shipping and FFL it ran him a mere $370.  The Lovely Harvey expresses that it fits her hand well.


It's compact in the sense that it's 0.4" shorter than the non-compact version.

Why, yes, it does accept a lanyard!

Compared to an M1911A1
Compared to an M&P 9
It's kind of a commander idea, full length grip with a shorter barrel.

My coon-finger review is that it's chunky, but not uncomfortable.  Double/Single action.  The decocker is also the slide release.  Everything is ambidextrously mirrored.  Easy take-down.  Machining on the inside of the slide is very coarse, on the frame very clean.  Bore access seems very high now that I am accustomed to the M&P.

If all goes well, we take it to the range tomorrow and see how it shoots.

There's even Engrish in the Certificate of Authenticity!


Mutable

Symbols are mutable.

The Confederate Battle Flag is perhaps the finest textbook example ever made.

It was an Army flag to identify units on the battlefield.

It's been a symbol of resistance to the evils done during Reconstruction.

It's been a symbol of racists from Reconstruction until at least 1992...


It's been nearly always used by Democrats when used for racism, come to think of it...

It's been a generic symbol of Southern Heritage and Pride (which always glosses over that slavery thing).

Still, symbols are mutable.

Anyone can walk off with your symbol and make it represent hate.

My copy of "Departmental Ditties and Barracks Room Ballads" has a swastika proudly emblazoned on its cover.  Since it's a 1913 printing the likelihood of it representing National Socialism is very very VERY small.

Should I burn my copy because an Eastern symbol of eternity, luck and prosperity was suborned?  Should we shun Hindus and Buddhists who still use it as part of their rituals and ceremonies?

Your symbol could be next.  Any symbol can be next.

And don't think because you're flying a liberal symbol you're immune, because unlike a lot of people condemning the Confederate Flag, I've experienced real hate from people flying the "all inclusive" LGBT rainbow.  Yet I still support their rights, because what rights they have are the same rights I have (if only we could get more people on both sides of this debate to become aware of that).

And just to go Godwin...  Someone else had a rainbow...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_concentration_camp_badges
Speaking of mutable, the Pink Pistols has taken the National Socialist badge, made it their own, and run with it!  Mutability is not a one-way ratchet.

12 July 2015

Armed

Dingus is armed, and sleeping.


Rifle On The Wall


"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." -- George Orwell

It's kind of ironic that this British rifle can't be on the wall of the labourer's cottage Mr Orwell had in mind when he made that statement.

Fury Road

I've seen it!

Still haven't paid to see it.

Turns out I have friends who manage at theaters and if I wanted to meet at this theater they'd play it at 0200 because they had to send their copy of the movie back soon.

Networking!

I think this is about the best Mad Max made to date.

Made even better by huge screen and just three people in the whole building.

I am happy that the content wasn't the hyper-feminist diatribe some attributed to the film.  The motives of the characters made sense and were personal rather than evangelical.

Wait What

One of those click-bait things in the sidebar at Facebook got me to click...

"13 Times Hollywood Made Totally Racist Casting Decisions"

One of them is casting Tom Cruise for "The Last Samurai".

Yes, casting an American actor to play an American is racist.  For reasons.

I guess that casting the entire Japanese portion of the cast with actual Japanese actors was racist as well?

I cannot wait for the tagline, "Samuel L Jackson IS Tokugawa Ieyasu!  IN Sengoku!"

Mutt

I overemphasize my Scots heritage.

In truth it's but a tiny slice of my ancestry.

The Scots part emigrated south to Jolly Ol' when offers of titles and lands were being made to get Scotland under heel by the English.  Family history is a bit vague about when this occurred.

This formerly Scot splinter flat refused to fight for their "homeland", having been bought they stayed bought.  Lands and titles in Scotland were forfeited, other lands and titles in England obtained.  Not a bad deal.  But for a long time they were "that Scottish family" where they'd settled.  It took a PR campaign and some royal endorsements to become English and that changed the family's name at the same time.

But this is just my father's side.  And that's not even pure English descent either.

I've a Japanese great-grandmother, a German great-grandmother and a mumble mumble don't talk about him great grandfather on Dad's side (rumor has it he was half-breed Souix or some other "we're not going to say inferior, but we're kinda racist about it even if he IS family" mixing).

Even my Italian mother's side isn't near so pure.  Both the great-grands on grampa's side were off-the-boat-WoP.  But grandma was English/Norwegian.

I am a mutt.

11 July 2015

Seitsemän Kuusi Kaksi Millimeter Täysi Metalli Vaippa



Tämä on minun kivääri. On monia muita kuten sitä, mutta tämä on minun. Minun kivääri on paras ystäväni. Se on elämäni. Minun on hallittava se minun on hallittava elämäni. Ilman minua, kivääri on hyödytön. Ilman minun kivääri, olen hyödytön. Minun on tulipalo minun kivääri totta. Minun täytyy ampua suorempi kuin minun vihollinen, joka yrittää tappaa minut. Minun täytyy ampua hänet ennen kuin hän ampuu minut. Aion. Jumalan edessä Vannon tämän uskontunnustuksen: minun kivääri ja minä olemme puolustajia maani, olemme mestareita vihollisemme, me olemme pelastajia elämäni. Olkoon niin, kunnes ei ole vihollinen, vaan rauha. Amen.

Balls

Dear Republican Party.

Stop running candidates.

Don't even bother.

The fucking speaker of the house doesn't even have the balls to just drop the mic and walk off when the press decides to change the subject of a scheduled press conference.

Lemme help you for next time, Boehner.

Say what you have to say.  When they don't ask questions about what you just said, just read the whole speech back to them.  Keep doing that until they talk about what you came to talk about or you get bored.

Stop treating them as if they weren't your opponents and you might find your job is a shit load more fun.  Act like they hate you, always have and always will, because they do hate you.

Republican Party?  Until you get that last message and stop caring if the press likes you, you're not going to ever get anything done.

But I think you already know that, and what the Democrats want is what you want...

Which brings me back to my second and third line above.

My Gawd It's Full Of Nerds

Trying to explain what a comic/sci-fi convention is to The Lovely Harvey...

"Imagine a gun show, except full of nerds."

She didn't run screaming, at least.

She's intrigued enough we might go to the Tampa Comicon or to Necronomicon.

If she has fun, perhaps even Dragon Con where the big dollars are pissed away.

Dragon Con is harder to dial in because The Boy might have State Special Olympics the same weekend.

Hot Lazy Summer Day

With scattered thunderstorms so going for a cruise with the top off is problematic.

It's the sort of day where I really feel like doing something, but can't be arsed to actually do it.

Damned hard-drives ate the shooting budget for a while too.

10 July 2015

This Is Tam's Fault


I am glad I had the DVD on hand, otherwise she'd have cost me money wanting to rewatch it.

Icky Reason I Don't IWB


That puckered scar is from a boil that got out of hand.  The main part of it is about an inch wide, with scarring going out another half inch surrounding.

I actually did almost die from this because the staph infection got into my bloodstream.  Nasty shit.

Well, if I carry inside the waistband, the holster puts a lot of pressure on this spot.  Short little guns, like my J-Frame, end right about on top of the scar and really dig in.

It's still tender, three years later.

Fundraiser

Clear your calendars!

Sunday 19 July 2015.  1pm to 4pm at Painting with a Twist...

http://www.paintingwithatwist.com/events/viewevent.aspx?eventID=306486

Passcode is: APPLE to RSVP.

This helps fund The Boy's school, so come out and paint some happy little trees!

If you can't make it, but wish to donate in a non-tax-deductable way; stab the paypal link to the right and I'll forward it to the school.

09 July 2015

Pristine

It is clear that I don't shoot enough.

Not a single one of my guns has become all beat to shit by me.

The guns that I have that are in that condition came to me in that condition.  I call it 'character' on my old milsurps.

My carry guns are starting to show signs of being carried.  They'd show more, but I had an extended period of changing out guns (and holsters) trying to find the combination I preferred.

I also had my carry permit for quite a while before I actually carried much at all.  Part of the problem was that I had two handguns at the time.  A Glock 21 and an ancient H&R "Automatic" revolver I'd inherited from my grandfather.

The Glock is a big handgun.  Too big for comfortable carry for me IWB and Florida doesn't lend itself to wearing enough for concealed on the belt.

Never mind that my car has very narrow seats and the seatbelt latch sits right where the gun wants to be.  There's plenty of space on the left side, oddly enough, making me think about cross-draw holsters, which I notice there aren't many.

I've gravitated to pocket carry and shoulder holsters (when it's cool enough).  Pockets have a definite size limit.

Pocket carry has also put the most wear on my carry guns.  It's a pretty harsh environment in there.

08 July 2015

How's That Gonna Work Again

A guy in Germany hid a Panther tank in his cellar for close 40 years.

This was after driving it around the neighborhood in the late '70's so it's not like nobody knew he'd had the thing.

So if someone in Germany can hide a tank for near 40 years, explain to me again how a handgun ban is going to work.

I really wanna know now.

Offensive Beer

Took a poll at the local brewery.

Nobody, including a local pastor, was actually offended by any of the offensive beer names presented in the Slate article, and many went looking for more off-color names to laugh about.

The clientele at Escape is about 40% female and the feeling I get from their responses was that the names could certainly be offensive if you were looking to be offended.

About what I figured.

So many "offensive" things just really aren't out in contact with normal people it seems.

07 July 2015

Dear Slate

You are morons.

In essence you're saying, "this is successful in marketing beer to its intended audience, you must stop doing it because people who are outside that demographic may become offended."

This is akin to demanding that My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic be taken off the air because it's known to offend middle-aged bikers through the existence of Bronies.  Hasbro will cater to nine-year-old girls and Bronies with MLP:FiP, but will ignore the offence to bikers because the bikers typically don't buy the product.

The target demographic for the "offensive" beers isn't people who would get offended at the off-color humor.

The real message in the article is, "why don't they make a beer that caters to MEEEEEEEEEEE?"  Actually, someone probably does...  I remember the white cans with the black "BEER" label.

Here's something I can say with reasonable certainty.  I am the housewife in my household, The Lovely Harvey is the "man" of the house with the job.  What I get to do is hang out with the other wives at work social functions while the men talk shop.  Guess how many of those girls are drinking beer.  Go on.

Me and maybe one other (not 32%).  Wine is the preferred drink of the person who's most likely to be offended by these "sexist" labels followed closely by sweet cocktails (or is it sexist to say cock now when referring to mixed drinks?).

If I go to these women you're apparently trying to shelter with your demand for more sensitive beer names, I think you're going to find they're going to laugh at both the humor on the labels and you for thinking those names are so offensive they need to be removed from the market.

Something else that bears mentioning is the women I know who drink beer, aren't the same sort of women who drink wine.  Entirely different mindset about lots of things.  Humor included.

I think what we have here is the brewers understanding their market better than a writer at Slate and catering to it, rather than worrying that they're missing 1/3 of their market from that pandering.

We don't really need to go too far here in the blogs.  Tam is a beer drinker, we could ask her if she's offended.  Tomorrow I'm going to a local nano-brewery and I can put it to both the owner and the beer-drinking female portion of the customers.

06 July 2015

Is Life Is No Getting Out Alive

The ending of the Firecracker 250 Firecracker 400 Firecracker Medal of Honor 400 Pepsi Firecracker 400 Pepsi 400 Coke-Zero 400 Powered by Coca-Cola last night this morning had a pretty spectacular crash where the Three Car driven flown by Austin Dillon got up into the fencing that's there to keep the car from continuing up into the bleachers.

The fencing did its job, but some debris still made it into the stands and some people were injured, none seriously and only one taken to the hospital.

But over at FoxNews...  A video speculating about whether the fans can sue NASCAR over this.  Perhaps.  But the real thrust of the piece is all about how things need to be made 100% safe for the fans.  Probability 1.0 safe.  Impossible for a fan to be injured safe.

I'll bet they'd approve a meteor defense system...

The thing is, despite the injuries sustained last night, you're a lot more likely to get hurt in the stands falling while trying to save your beer from spilling when you were watching the race while walking instead of where you were putting your feet.  And at $8 for 12 oz. of Budweiser, by The GAWDS you are GOING to save that beer!

It's more dangerous leaving the track to head home than it is sitting in the stands!

The current talking-head-press for safety definitely forgets that people used to die when shit went wrong at the races.  It wasn't even very long ago, really.  NASCAR has been proactive about making things safer and is constantly working on it, and they talk about it all the time.

So piss off FoxNews commentators.  You probably had to google every proper noun you used in your commentary.

Seagate Sucks

Or so I am told by every review I've read in my quest to replace a failed Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 drive.

My history with Seagate...

The failed drive was made on 09Sep08.  As was its partner.

The drive that came with the computer is a 320gb  Barracuda 7200.10; made on 22May08.

The oldest drive I still use regularly is a 250gb Barracuda 7200.9 made on 02May06!  This is the Bootcamp'd Win7 Ultimate/64 drive I use to run my flight sims.

All in all I've had good luck with Seagate.

My original Bootcamp drive that ran WinXP Pro still lives in an external enclosure as spare data storage.  It's a Western Digital Green Power made on 20Jan09.

I've a stack of old IDE drives that probably still work too.

Tapped

The universe can sense when you're tapped out.

Budgeted for my vacation to Indiana.

Saved for a whole year.

Went on vacation and spent the money.

Hard drive crapped out on the main machine!

Luckily, and happily, it was in a RAID mirror!

No data lost, yet.  Both drives were same make, model and bought at the same time.  So the remaining drive might be on very borrowed time.

Fingers crossed that it lasts a bit!

04 July 2015

Not Legally Binding Document

In Congress, July 4, 1776. [239 years ago]

The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America,

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts: John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton




[Type this thing in manually sometime instead of copy pasting it. The stuff we put up with on a daily basis would have the founders shooting already. Any time someone calls you intolerant, remember we're tolerating far more than they were in 1776 and they literally called their suffering "the intolerable acts"!]

This is yet another day that's not about veterans (dead or alive) or soldiers. Those are Memorial Day, Veteran's Day and Armed Forces Day (respectively). Today is also not Flag Day, despite the prominent red-white-and-blue bunting.

Set off some fireworks, burn some questionable meat and reflect on what we've lost and could regain.

Never forget what those men signing that document were risking, and many of them gave nearly all.

Doomed

This just in, the F4F-2, widely deployed by our Naval forces in the Pacific Theater are unable to out maneuver Japanese A6M-5 aircraft in flight regimes that favor the enemy aircraft.

We are completely doomed in this theater and should sue for peace immediately as there is no hope whatsoever to attain any aerial victories against these nimble and untouchable foes.

Combined with the virtual eradication of Chennault's Flying Tigers there is no reason to continue to fight against the Imperial Juggernaut.

Or maybe an F-16D-40 beating an F-35A pre-production plane when specifically testing particular flight regimes and envelopes to explore the idea of changing the flight control laws isn't the end of the world?

03 July 2015

I Am Now Obamacovered!

Got my information packet and booklet explaining what the VA will cover.

I skimmed it.

Can't wait to start the tedious process to get my disability reassessed again.

Thanks for erasing all those records you fucking prick!

Designing a system that takes years to navigate and closing all unresolved cases older than a year?

How can I tell this was a government program?

Even more fun was learning that if I'd had a higher percentage, the reassessments were nearly automatic.

Have I ever mentioned that there's not a reputable lawyer I've spoken to who will represent me?

Because I have the honor of serving between the end of Vietnam and before the beginning of Gulf War I.

This also means no VFW, American Legion, etc...  All the heavyweight veterans orgs don't give two shits about Cold War Vets either (at least they sound sorry about their charters forbidding it).

I'd prolly not be near so bitter about it, but I know more than a couple "Vietnam Era" vets who did the exact same things as I did in Germany and came as close as I did to Vietnam while enlisted.  But the VA rolls over backwards and they're allowed to join up with the VFW.

Bad Form

Some has-been actor has said, "I am sorry that you took the racist thing I said at face value as racism. I will now explain that what I meant is not the plain, racist, meaning of what I said. In the course of the explanation it will become clear that I am not actually sorry and did, indeed, mean the racist thing I said at face value. It will also become clear that I am actually sorry people are upset that I am a racist rather than being sorry about being a racist."

I am getting so very sick of these non-apologies.

02 July 2015

Mount Soledad

I've posted from time to time on this thing.

Today I find that it's still going on!

When I last looked there was an order to destroy it.

Now we're back to stays and appeals and the Feds selling the land to the people who tried to buy it from San Diego but couldn't because the ACLU has decided that this cross WILL be destroyed.

If it's not on government land, there's no legal way to force that so the sale to a private owner must be blocked.

What a fucking waste of money and effort.

The Stakes

In my flag waving post...

What happened to Brendan Eich is exactly the wrong way to handle political disagreement.

What was announced is that if you disagree with the winners in a particular political issue on your own time with your own money your livelihood is at risk.

He was forced to resign for backing the losing side in the gay marriage debate.

Did he preach at work?  No.

Did he change any policies at Mozilla to make it unfriendly to homosexuals?  No.

He donated money in the course of peaceful political discourse.

And was excoriated for it when the donation list was made public.

I am unsatisfied about the circumstances surrounding the release of that list.

But knowing that your political donations can be made public and your donations to any given cause can be used as grounds for termination?  It's known as having a chilling effect on such donations.

As I am sure the people who leaked that list were well aware of.

Flag Waving

If I wave a Confederate Battle Flag, what am I saying?

Think hard about that.

The reason I say you should think hard on that is very rarely are the people waving or displaying these flags being asked what they are saying.

We sure are hearing from the people who've decided that waving said flag can only mean racism.  They communicate that anyone who says they're displaying that flag for reasons other than racism is lying about their motivations.

Good footing to start on.  "You there, lying racist!"

I've mentioned before that symbols are mutable.

It means that any symbol's meaning is very subjective.

Because there's a large group of people who find this flag racist, I'd normal say, "let's be polite about it and take them down."  The problem with the being polite "solution" is the Confederate Battle Flag is just the latest in the "everything is racism if you're white" parade.

I've mentioned this sort of thing before.  Somebody wants a race war.  I don't think it will end like they think.

We're rapidly getting to the point where not being a racist is no longer a defense to the charge of being a racist.  I am a racist because I am white is a racist accusation!

It will just be assumed that I am lying about it and I will be punished as if I had been a racist all along.

The most disturbing thing about the accusation of lying is that the reason it sticks.  They've made telling the truth criminal in some cases and career ending in others (just ask Brendan Eich).  It makes lying about your true thoughts and positions a matter of self defense!  What we're getting is worse than racism and thought police.  We're getting our freedom to peacefully object to political policy removed bit by bit.

Legal participation in the political process, as is your right as an American citizen is now grounds for termination should your political position be in opposition to... to...  it can be anything.  No it can't be anything, it's always the position of one side in these debates that causes it.

Compare the treatment of Brendan Eich to that of Irene Gallo in the social justice war camps to see what I mean.

Edit to add:

01 July 2015

Why

How come my M&P 9 seems all whizzer-shiny high-tech and modern when I put a light on it?


I think it might be the resemblance to Winona from Farscape.

No, it doesn't look a thing like it, it's a feel thing.

We're all about teh feels now, right?

Negative Percent Lower Kit


Lots of work to complete the lowers from this, but there's also a whole bunch in there!

Just Me I Am Sure

I'm reading Scalia's dissent to King v Burwell.

I am sure I am not the first person to notice...

The technicality where States were confused for the Machiavellian THE STATE could easily have been caught and made so clear that only an idiot would have gotten the intent wrong;

IF ONLY THE GODS BE DAMNED THING HAD BEEN READ IN FULL, DEBATED COMPLETELY AND THEN VOTED ON!

Rather than doing "we have to pass it to find out what's in it" and parliamentary procedure skulduggery where the Senate actually generated a bill where The Constitution (remember that document?) says bills of that type were supposed to originate from The House.

The original ruling, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, where it became a tax instead of a fine underscores the problem of it originating in the Senate!

Gay Rights

Something to consider when you're worried about "teh gheys"...

Once they're just people like the rest of is, they will now be free to vote conservatively if they want, and lots of my gay friends do!

Over and over I wonder...

What party do I turn to if I don't really care about abortion, support gay rights, state's rights, the nation-state model and property rights and oppose gun control the UN and the creeping nanny-state?

Whom do I vote for?

Hipster

Tam can't be a hipster.

In every photograph I've seen of her...

The glasses (if any) are for eye protection.

The gun burkha is not flannel.

No discernible beard at all on her neck.

Not once, despite her frustrating me a few times, have I ever had the urge to punch her in the neck or blast her with a fire hose.

Snark is not irony.

Supreme Court Are Lawyers

They're all lawyers, that's why they can't see the simple texts in front of them.

Row v Wade:

No power to do anything whatsoever in the text of the Constitution, Feds forbidden further by 9th and 10th.  States constrained by 14th.

No need of emanations or penumbras.

Gay Marriage:

Marriage is a religious ceremony.  1st Amendment means no Federal involvement, 14th means no states.  This also means that if the local Catholic priest won't tie your knot you've got no recourse.  It also means that there's no hard legal means to settle divorces, unless churches mandate the signing of a civil union as a condition of using their religious ritual.

Bigamy/Polyamory:

See gay marriage.

None of this is actually complicated, but just like simple laws become regulatory morass, stare decisis prevents simple rulings.