Watching the mud tests that Ian and Karl are doing at InRange...
They got an AK to fail. They've gotten an M1 Garand to fail. Their first test was a MAS-49/59, M1A and AR-15. They've even taken a Kel-Tec RDB to task (and it failed too).
The AR has done best of them all, followed by the MAS.
Almost like direct impingement is a reliability enhancer?
In the original test, there was open water, and I was trained to swish my rifle in the water should it get smashed into the mud; something they deliberately didn't do. Their testing is deliberately making it worst case.
I'll bet a quick swish would have prevented the AK from failing, but the Garand and derivatives were stopped by stuff falling into the action from its mostly open design.
Now I want to see them do more, and they plan it.
In particular, I want them to do a stock M1A vs H&K vs FAL.
02 January 2016
1 comment:
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'll bet an SKS does better. It might even improve accuracy! LOL!
ReplyDelete