Victim of gun theft gets rest of collection stolen by state under color of law.
This is where blaming the victim ultimately leads.
Punishing the victim is very popular with Vichy Gunowners.
They spend far more time condemning the practice of keeping a gun in a car than they do blaming the person actually at fault, the thief.
Congratulations, Vichy Gunowners, your advocacy has been codified in Connecticut!
Why stop at "don't keep a gun in your car and it won't get stolen" and go straight to "don't own a gun and there's no gun to be stolen!"
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
I still live in the shit-hole I refer to as Kommiecticut, only because my wife isn't ready to leave. Me, I'd sell everything that I could replace and take with me only what fits in a U-Haul.
ReplyDeleteThe writer of the article is correct, the law will change behavior. After the post Sandy Hook intolerable/unconstitutional acts of 2013, I contend the state lost more control over firearms than they had or will ever admit to. There is an underground gun economy of trades and sales happening without the required permission of our overlords. Then of course, there is the 85% non-compliance with firearm and magazine registration. It is the one guy doing something dumb that gets caught and makes headlines. In 2013 state officials stated "vigorous enforcement" of the new laws, but in reality, they have been frightened into inaction by all of us that have flipped them the bird.
Damn. And to think at one time Connecticut was on the forefront of open carry, carry always, practicing in public spaces, Get off My Lawn, and so forth.
ReplyDeleteWP says it quite well, Kommiecticut. Damn socialists.
So hows that 'don't scare the children, don't fly your freak flag' working out for the free citizens of Connecticut? Gee... if we let them have these laws they'll leave us alone...
Except for all of the 85% that are now felons-in-waiting, due to non-compliance.
This is why we can't have nice things. Our side has compromised so much that they don't see an issue in making the normal common man a felony-in-waiting.
House fire? FD reports a gun safe. Gun safe broken into by cops. Ooooh, look, unregistered guns, must be house of a Felon-in-waiting. Sure, it hasn't happened, yet.
Here's a gun right...snip. There's a gun right...snip. Another gun right...snip, snip, snip, snip. Pretty soon all we'll have left of a full coat of rights is a sleeve button. And the 2A Gun Writers will be all about that button and not anything about all the rest of the coat that's been cut away.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Dammit, what is so damned hard about that statement.
Registration - infringement.
Storage laws - infringement.
Restriction this - infringement.
Restriction that - infringement.
Can't carry here - infringement.
Can't carry this way - infringement.
Only allowed to buy this list of guns - infringement.
Infringement.
Infringement.
Infringement.
But all we get from some gun writers is "Don't rock the boat, or it will sink us all." Fruck it. Rock away, baby. Rock it all night long!
Frothing mad about this and other things. Frothing mad.