Posts
I propose a change in doctrine, if not a Constitutional amendment, where if a case is rejected or dismissed for a lack of standing; the court MUST identify precisely who DOES.
Refusing a case on a lack of standing makes an implication that the case would have merit, if only the plaintiff had standing to bring the case before them.
I am thinking that if they had to tell us whom actually did have standing, they'd be taking more cases because they'd be seeing those plaintiffs coming forward immediately after such a rejection.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.