Posts
Bloke on the Range has a video up talking about the litigation between GWACS Armory and KE Arms et al.
Someone said that Karl and Russell weren't given the opportunity to defend themselves in the Arfcom thread that got locked and got themselves banned with.
Au Contraire!
I read that damned thread. And the other three they participated in.
While not the only parties guilty of moving the goalposts, they never did answer some of the direct questions put to them.
And I said so in the comments to Bloke's vid.
I got replied to.
If I am charitable, they asserted that Karl and Russel didn't need to reply to some of the accusatory "questions."
But those aren't the questions I was saying remained unanswered.
I pointed that out.
Hit send just as I realized... It was a waste of time to engage there.
I don't think the person I was replying to cares.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.