Posts
SAF posts the text of the decision of a 3-judge panel in the 9th Circuit for Jones v Bonta.
I have not finished reading it yet but it appears that outright bans need to pass strict scrutiny.
They said that training requirements for 18-20 year olds only have to pass intermediate scrutiny, which confuses me. What other right requires training?
Smarter people with more time are going to post about it on their blogs as well.
I expect the status quo to remain while it's appealed and joins a long line of rulings awaiting an en banc hearing in the 9th.
I wonder how this will play out here in the 11th circuit and Florida's ban on 18-20 year olds buying guns.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.