15 January 2024

Solution Looking For A Problem

The TMAG.

 


I am torn on the utility of translucent magazines, just as I am torn on the utility of the cute little window on many of my PMAGs.

For the most part I got the medium coyote tan mags with windows because of a rumor that they were being held to tighter tolerances than the other flavors because of the USMC contract.  Most places don't charge THAT much more than for the non-window black ones.

It's $15 for a normal 30-round PMAG.  $18 for one with a window.

$24 for translucent.

I am not sure it's worth the extra money to me, but your mileage may vary.

Posted by Angus McThag at 16:43
Labels: , ,

2 comments:

  1. Software Janior15 January, 2024 17:03

    On first signt it looked suspiciously like the old RAM-Line mag that fit in either an AR or a Mini-14. Although it didn't work that great in either one.
    -swj

    ReplyDelete
  2. slow joe crow15 January, 2024 18:17

    I think the translucent PMAG is a me too version of the Lancer or ETS magazines. The ETS magazine coupler is neat but either ETS doesn't hold tight tolerances or my receiver and their tooling are at the extreme because I have trouble getting them to seat reliably, unlike my GI magazines and PMAGs

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)