At first nod, the idea of banning guns from a place seems to make sense.
No guns, no shooting. No shooting, nobody can get shot!
But then you look at it harder in application.
Other than a sign, what's keeping the guns out of most of these zones?
When I go to the courthouse, there's armed deputies and a metal detector. And a long tedious line.
When I go to a school, there's nothing actually stopping a person with a gun, or anyone checking for them.
What happens when a shooter ignores the sign?
People get shot, but there's something else.
The police show up and then will do nothing to stop the shooter for an extended time, if they do anything at all.
The vast majority of these mass shootings end with the shooter deciding they'd done enough; not with the police actually stopping them.
But don't worry, the police officers are very safe in their cordon. They're all going to make it home.
Armed spectators they are, in the name of officer safety and procedures.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.