01 September 2022

Watching Fanatics Argue With Fanatics Is Not As Fun As I Supposed

I gave up on Miggy's blog a while ago.  I stop in occasionally.

His co-blogger lies.

"Remember, they didn’t get open carry legal in Florida, they got rifles in public banned."

They did?

What law is this?

Because I checked.  No changes have been made to Florida's open carry laws.

The state pre-emption on gun laws is intact.

The open carry activists have had zero effect.  Nothing positive.  Nothing negative.

IN FLORIDA.

Every other state where open carry of rifles was predicted to be the end of gun rights forever are now licensed open or constitutional carry.

All.  Even Texas.

I've been saying, for a long time, that the freak the mundanes model given us by the LGBT crowd is an effective one.  But since that comes from those "icky queers," can't use that model, can you?

But, J. Kb, you should not lie about the effects of open carry in Florida on the passage of laws.

He and Miggy seem to be of the, "the rights I have now are perfect, therefore no changes need be made at all," camp.  It's nice that the world aligned for them so well, but some of us want what was promised us returned.

I cannot find "unless that right so offends" or other words to that effect in the US Constitution or the Florida Constitution.

In the immortal words of Mike Muir,

"Just cause you don't understand what's going on don't mean it don't make no sense
And just cause you don't like it, don't mean it ain't no good"


and

"And if I offended you, oh I'm sorry...
But maybe you need to be offended
But here's my apology and one more thing...fuck you!"

1 comment:

  1. Ayup. Why, oh why, is it so difficult for the Fuds to understand that "The Right of the People to Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed" surpasses their concealed-carry-only butt-hurt butts?

    Constitutional Laws, like, well, the 2nd are very much Black-or-White. No shades of grey or gray. Either you have the right to say whatever you want or you don't have any rights to say anything (contrary to squishy findings by various Supremes and lesser judges.) Either your rights to bear arms shall not be infringed or they can be, which means if they can then you don't have rights above the government which means you have no rights at all, only permissions given to you by your masters.

    Simple friggin yes/no situation.

    And Fuds like the blog you mention are enemies of the truth. Might as well say "It's okay because they're just (insert some oppressed group that originated in the Middle East and wasn't founded in the 7th Century AD.)"

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.