10 March 2023

Notsofast Giudo!

A three judge panel of the 11th Circuit ruled that banning gun sales to 18-20 year olds was Constitutional.

Normally, the plaintiffs have to appeal to an en banc, and if that don't work, the Supreme Court.

However...

The other judges in the circuit can declare an en banc review by asking for a poll of the judges in that circuit.

This appears to be happening in NRA v Bondi.

1 comment:

  1. Georgia, Alabama, and Florida Circus did what??

    That looks ripe for either the poll that shows those three judges are out of step with the circuit, or a recipe
    for a yuuuuuge spanking by SCOTUS, starting with prima facie violations of both the 2nd, 14th, and 26th Amendments.
    I'm hoping it's the former, and the rest of the Circuit can simply smell blood in the water.
    Easier all around.

    But seeing the latter would be glorious.

    ReplyDelete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: Sign your work. Try this link for an explanation: https://mcthag.blogspot.com/2023/04/lots-of-new-readers.html

Anonymous comments must pass a higher bar than others. Repeat offenders must pass an even higher bar.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.