It is full of lots of useful information. But you are correct, he thinks he is unbiased, but he bases a number of things on judgments that show a very traditional leftist bias. It is pretty obvious in places. He takes normal Democratic partisan points as gospel and completely overlooks a lot of possible alternative conclusions to things based on that. A lot of time even when I agree with him on things, I think he comes to the right conclusions for the wrong reasons.
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.
Posts
It is full of lots of useful information. But you are correct, he thinks he is unbiased, but he bases a number of things on judgments that show a very traditional leftist bias. It is pretty obvious in places. He takes normal Democratic partisan points as gospel and completely overlooks a lot of possible alternative conclusions to things based on that. A lot of time even when I agree with him on things, I think he comes to the right conclusions for the wrong reasons.
ReplyDelete