CADA violates the 1st Amendment.
6-3 decision along party lines.
The Obama/Biden judges taking their normal position of free speech only matters when it's THEIR speech.
This, by the say, is the same law that tried to force a baker to make wedding cakes for gay marriages.
It's the second time the Supreme Court has ruled on it.
It's also a situation we gun owners are familiar with.
Narrow rulings that chip away at the violations of our rights that force the victims to keep going through the process over and over until it's finally done away with.
The CADA law is also a shining example of how you cannot legislate people into liking you.
Discrimination from bigotry is real. How do you stop it?
Laws forbidding discrimination fuel the bigotry, and are readily weaponized by the crybullies.
See the recent rulings on Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard
College, and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North
Carolina on how that worked. Also a loss for the crybullies!
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.
Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.
If you're trying to comment anonymously: You can't. Log into your Google account.
If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.