This guy posts so often I wonder if he just likes hearing his own voice, but...
Finding the 4473 unconstitutional would be epic!
Especially since there's nothing in the actual law requiring it.
Click here to submit $0.00 US for a lifetime subscription
Posts
Comments
It's only required by bureaucratic regulations.
ReplyDeleteNot even going into the constitutionality of the BATFE and all the arms restriction regulations and laws.
NFA 1934 is unconstitutional. Virtually all gun laws in the US ride on top of it, including GCA 1968, which is even more unconstitutional and has more bad laws riding on top of it. If SCOTUS had any cajones at all they'd deep six both of those and send everthing else down in flames with them. - swj
ReplyDeleteA lot of those sites jabber so much pulled straight out of their own underpants, with no beef on the bun, I ignore them all on principle 99 times out of 100.
ReplyDeleteIf they could stick to posting when there was an actual court decision to talk about, rather than trying to give play-by-play on the intermission at a play, I'd pay closer attention.
But then, I'm not trying to earn my living with YouTube views.
The problem is the constitutionality questioning of the laws and regulations have been treated much like the election issues of 2020. The courts refused to see any opposition until the laws and regulations were passed (or ballots certified) and then said "It's a done deal, too late."
DeleteOnly recently have any courts started to acknowledge that there are issues with arms restrictions and regulations (and with the 2020 and 2022 stolen elections.) Just not enough court decisions to bring down the pile of regulations and laws that are patently illegal (along with the supremely corrupt election laws and regulations that allowed 2020 and 2022.)
The Supremes dropping the ball on the 1934 law and it's been uphill ever since.
The greater issues are all valid ones.
DeleteBut being lawyers, they're used to getting paid by the minute and the word.
If they'd save their 27 consecutive "updates" for the one day a month when there was actually anything new to "update" from an actual sitting court, I'd be pleased as punch to follow along.
But it's 26 days of clickbait to one substantive vlogpost.
Ask CNN how that works out as an operational model.
On the greater issue, AFAIC, the colonial militia was storing cannons and their ammunition at Lexington and Concord, and the Constitution acknowledges and envisages the ready commissioning of privateers, so per the tenets of Bruen, in particular, any crew-served army weaponry up to and including field artillery and modern cavalry weapons, and any weapons system found and deployed on a serving US Navy vessel of war, should be available for purchase and deployment by private citizens.
(The final stroke out of the management of the NRA at that interpretation should be their long-overdue demise, both corporately and individually.)
When judges read Heller, McDonald, and Bruen rightly that way, we'll get our country back.
But I ain't holding my breath.