25 July 2020

Bottom Heavy

Something I've noticed about the composition of the Army's units in the late 19th century is an amazing lack of officers.

They're barely outnumbered by the NCO's.

Due to the dispersed nature of the frontier army, a company or troop was a fairly autonomous unit too.

It occurs to me that there's no staff built into the TO&E that's not also someone who's at the tooth end.

The 1890's US Cavalry has a tooth to tail ratio that the Mobile Infantry would respect.

2 comments:

  1. But does every trooper from tooth to tail fight? Every cap trooper drops. Even the sky marshal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The MI would respect it, not envy or emulate it.

      The Chaplin isn't supposed to fight in the 19th Century Cav, but he's there in the thick of it.

      The supporting train is at least among the troopers when things go to shit too.

      Custer's message, "Come quick, bring packs!" wasn't addressed to Fort Keogh, after all.

      Delete

You are a guest here when you comment. This is my soapbox, not yours. Be polite. Inappropriate comments will be deleted without mention. Amnesty period is expired.

Do not go off on a tangent, stay with the topic of the post. If I can't tell what your point is in the first couple of sentences I'm flushing it.

If you're trying to comment anonymously: Sign your work. Try this link for an explanation: https://mcthag.blogspot.com/2023/04/lots-of-new-readers.html

Anonymous comments must pass a higher bar than others. Repeat offenders must pass an even higher bar.

If you can't comprehend this, don't comment; because I'm going to moderate and mock you for wasting your time.